Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qeshm Air Flight 1202


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Qeshm Air Flight 1202

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete per WP:NOTNEWS - article is about an aircraft which once had a mechanical problem, causing a flight delay. Chetsford (talk) 04:50, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nom and this doesn't even come close to meeting the WP:AIRCRASH non-binding notability guideline. SportingFlyer (talk) 07:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable aviation incident. WP:NOTNEWS also applies....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. This might actually pass WP:AIRCRASH as it seems like the damage was a writeoff (particularly with the crane next day - on an old aircraft). However, no fatalities. Landing gear mishaps are common. Sourcing does not establish GNG (and not much more available in BEFORE), and no lasting impact expected.Icewhiz (talk) 11:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * That's true, but I'm not sure it's been written off yet. Coverage probably won't survive the newscycle anyways. SportingFlyer (talk) 03:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I generally vote 'keep' on air crash articles, but here, I must say that it is poorly sourced and fails at WP:GNG and WP:AIRCRASH, so I must vote 'delete'. No apparent hull loss, no fatalities, nothing important. L293D (☎ • ✎) 01:39, 4 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.