Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Kevin (talk) 04:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Qik

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article mostly edited by one person, several of the sources for the article are the company blog or webpage. Reads like a press release from the company.XinJeisan (talk) 09:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Candidate for cleanup. There are many third-party references (e.g. Washington Post) which indicates notability. Aiken   &#9835;  11:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Loads of reliable sources available here. Any sourcing and neutrality concerns can be fixed by editing. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: I agree with Phil - Ret.Prof (talk) 00:50, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.