Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qiu Xiaofei


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:56, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Qiu Xiaofei

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Is this artist sufficiently notable? Nothing I see in the article or in a quick Google search suggests so. Delete unless notability shown. ---Nlu (talk) 01:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 10:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 10:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 10:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment I've added several references to the article, though I think more are needed to be sure on Notability. According to Art News his works sell for $50K-$100K. Note also that the Google News link above turns up his presence in various articles. Also note that the Google Books link turns up various snippet views of discussions of his work, including what looks like a substantial review in Flash Art. AllyD (talk) 21:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:00, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:42, 1 October 2012 (UTC)


 * weak Keep sufficient sourcing, though i would like evidence of a work actually being in a major museum., DGG ( talk ) 03:29, 2 October 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.