Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qoin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 05:26, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Qoin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Company is not notable at this time, either from the provided references or a search. There is one passing reference in the Guardian reference and nothing from a reliable, third-party source showing up in a search. Stesmo (talk) 16:31, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: no element of notability. Its nothing but blatant advert.Wikicology (talk) 16:56, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete It's n ot a speedy as blatant advertising, since the article is purely factual, except for the one word "expert" . But it's the factual description of a company which is not yet notable.  DGG ( talk ) 17:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.