Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qool


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Qool

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails the notabilityguidelines for having no reliable sources Lakokat 12:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No obvious reliable 3rd party sources; failed WP:NSOFT. AllyD (talk) 18:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete appears to fail GNG. SarahStierch (talk) 07:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.