Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qorviq the Nondenominational Winter Solstice Celebration Seal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Qorviq the Nondenominational Winter Solstice Celebration Seal

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable novel. No sources. Makes undocumented claim of Pulitzer Prize nomination, likely false. Contested PROD, removed by User:The De-PROD Meister during his October 11 reign of terror. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete db-hoax may not quite fit -- the book exists -- but it's purely self-promotional. is the book's author. WP:N, WP:SPAM, WP:V, etc. &mdash; Scientizzle 19:09, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * FYI: The author's LinkedIn page suggests, to me at least, this may be self-promotion as performance art. I don't have the heart to vote for its deletion, so I won't say anything.--Carwil (talk) 02:26, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable book without any coverage in reliable sources. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  16:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: as failing WP:V, WP:N, WP:NBOOK and WP:BULLSHIT to boot. To quote from the author's Linkedin page: "After getting the boot from corporate America, only to come to the realization that I was a creative genius, I struck off on my own. I created Qorviq the Nondenominational Winter Solstice Celebration Seal which began as a blog, and after making $0.30 in Google Adsense Revenue I decided to publish a book on it, which was then nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, by me. I have sold one copy." 'Nuf 'Ced.   Ravenswing  16:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - blatant self-promotion. &mdash; RHaworth 11:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Propotional, non-RS material. Tarc (talk) 18:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.