Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qrator


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  11:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Qrator

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Routine announcements or company-generated PR. While some references are from "reliable sources", there are no references that pass the criteria for establishing notability. -- HighKing ++ 12:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  12:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  12:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Power~enwiki (talk) 00:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- WP:GNG & WP:CORPDEPTH fail. The article is exclusively promotional, with content such as:
 * The company currently makes revenue from commissions on sales.[18] In a recent interview, its founder said he expects a growth of 250% per year! Etc.
 * Basically, spam. Surprisingly accepted at AfD two years ago and has not improved since. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Forbes Brazil is the only publication with anything in-depth and is only one publication. Failes WP:CORPDEPTH.--CNMall41 (talk) 20:59, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches turned up nothing to show it passes WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.  Onel 5969  TT me 04:38, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.