Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qriket


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  14:27, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Qriket

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is written overly like an advertisement and has only one article about it from a notable source, appears to me this is not deep enough coverage to pass WP:CORPDEPTH. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 20:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  10:25, 17 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete - My vote can change if more reliable sources pop up. I can only find two, in English, that significantly cover the subject. Meatsgains (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Additional contributions over the next week would be welcome. KaisaL (talk) 16:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 16:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete  I don't see sources meeting WP:CORPDEPTH, most of what's there, even the TechCrunch piece, fails at independence with quite a bit of it looking like material generated from a press release.  That was my sense of the two Japanese-language sources I attempted to assess using automated translation as well. --joe deckertalk 16:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.