Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuSheet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY DELETE. postdlf (talk) 18:31, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

QuSheet

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete Could probably be speedy deleted as spam, especially given the fact that the article was written by the author of the software. But even if that aspect is cleaned up, the software still fundamentally fails to reach the notability threshold. Pichpich (talk) 15:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Procedural question: can we have both this discussion and the one about deleting User:Rdevelyn/QuSheet simultaneously? Or do we really need to separate the AfD and the MfD? Pichpich (talk) 16:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Technically, AfDs are for articles only. Guoguo12  --Talk--  02:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Speedy Delete - Promotional material. CycloneGU (talk) 02:26, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Subject does not appear notable and the article does not assert significance. Guoguo12  --Talk--  02:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD. This is advertising copy, and completely run-of-the-mill at that. Thryduulf (talk) 03:41, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, unambiguous advertising. So tagging. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:09, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.