Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quadicle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete per WP:MADEUP and WP:SNOWBALL. -- 09:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Quadicle

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. After a plea by an IP editor in an edit summary I left the article, heavily tagged, for a few weeks, and asked the creator and major editor to address my concerns re: WP:VERIFY, WP:NOR, WP:NEO and WP:MADEUP. Two weeks later and no change (that'll teach me!). The main grounds for nomination are lack of verifiability - or indeed any proof of existence. I think just the "History of the Quadiclists" section qualifies it. kateshortforbob 19:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Hoax, or non-notable at best. MarkBul 19:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as utter bollocks. Quadicle Society? Mass quadiclicide? *head asplode* Tony Fox (arf!) 20:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Hugely Strong Delete as QBS (according to the article, Quadicle B.S.) It starts out shaky and just gets worse from there. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 20:53, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not the Urban Dictionary. Fails WP:NEO strongly. -- B figura (talk) 20:54, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per everyone else. Until I read the article I thought it was about a condition of someone with 4 testicles :0 --WebHamster 21:36, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I think this must be a hoax. I'm pretty sure it's unsourceable: Google returns basically nothing except for WP and some myspace links. Jakew 21:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - It seems like either a hoax or spam. Either way, it's got to go. TheInfinityZero 21:58, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Early closing, see above. -- Karada 09:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.