Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quadri-


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect. &mdash;Cryptic 01:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Quadri-


Topic is subsumed by Wiktionary entry Quad- Myasuda 03:14, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. MER-C 03:57, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Redirect per Uncle G. Isn't there a speedy category for dicdefs? -- Jim Douglas (talk)  (contribs)  04:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No. I think the concern is that the difference between dicdef and not is too thin and subjective. -Amarkov blahedits 05:57, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and others. 1ne 06:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; dicdef. SkierRMH 08:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete dicdef. feydey 11:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No deletion is required. Like I did with most of the others, almost a year ago, redirect to numerical prefix, which is an encyclopaedia article on numerical prefixes that is cross-linked to the several dictionary articles on the individual numerical prefixes. Uncle G 13:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per Uncle G. - Mike МиГ 14:04, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.