Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quaianlagen (disambigation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:50, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Quaianlagen (disambigation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

mispelling ZH8000 (talk) 13:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. A disambiguation page with only one link to an article is even worse than WP:TWODABS. sst ✈  13:58, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  13:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  13:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment: Misspellings most often are just moved. You first nominated for AfD, then you moved the page, and then you removed the AfD template from the page. I'm confused. Sam Sailor Talk! 01:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That's not quite correct. First I moved it to Quaianlage (disambiguation) (target), then I (tried to) nominate(d) the original article Quaianlagen (disambigation) (source) for AfD, but the AfD message appeared on the moved article (target) instead (otherwise the title above would be called like the target!!), which I do not like to be deleted, of course. So I removed it from there. -- ZH8000 (talk) 16:55, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. OK, so "Quaianlagen" is an incorrect spelling of the main term "Quaianlage"? Am I getting that right? If so, then the redirect can easily be deleted, probably as a speedy, but definitely as part of this AFD. Is there any concern about the disambiguation page itself? UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 20:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I meant the redirect from Quaianlagen (disambigation). The redirect from Quaianlagen is absolutely proper. And there do not appear to be any actual links to the Quaianlagen disamb page (nor should there be). UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:30, 6 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete unnecessary redirect Quaianlagen (disambigation). The dab page itself and the redirect from Quaianlagen should remain as-is. I have restored the AfD notice on the nominated redirect. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:34, 6 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.