Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quail rock art panel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The delete !voters' concern about sources has been remedied. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 16:16, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Quail rock art panel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems like a hoax. No reliable source coverage that I could find (self-published books such as this are not reliable). Everymorning  talk  15:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  15:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  15:02, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:49, 26 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete - as above. Neutralitytalk 04:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  12:13, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Before I recommend keep, I would like to have Everymorning  and Neutrality look at the below sources.  The below were not easy to find, but I think they provide sufficient support for notability at least as to "Quail Panel" in Grand Gulch off Step Canyon near Cedar Mesa in the San Rafael Swell.  I still have not found anything authoritative regarding the Swaseys but will search more.  If anything, Richard Wetherill appears to have been involved at least with exploring the area.  (I have not previously been involved with this article and otherwise know nothing about this subject.)--Rpclod (talk) 20:02, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This article reads like a stub, and yet it has been around for a while. I don't have access to the books listed, but I'm going to AGF that there is additional info in them that hasn't been added to the article. I would like to see it marked as a stub and at least added to Rock_art. Then I hope someone will come along and expand it. LaMona (talk) 01:59, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V. Zero sources in the article itself, which is what matters to readers.  Sandstein   11:48, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the nudge. I have now added the above reference and recommend a keep.--Rpclod (talk) 12:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This article reads like a stub, and yet it has been around for a while. I don't have access to the books listed, but I'm going to AGF that there is additional info in them that hasn't been added to the article. I would like to see it marked as a stub and at least added to Rock_art. Then I hope someone will come along and expand it. LaMona (talk) 01:59, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V. Zero sources in the article itself, which is what matters to readers.  Sandstein   11:48, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the nudge. I have now added the above reference and recommend a keep.--Rpclod (talk) 12:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This article reads like a stub, and yet it has been around for a while. I don't have access to the books listed, but I'm going to AGF that there is additional info in them that hasn't been added to the article. I would like to see it marked as a stub and at least added to Rock_art. Then I hope someone will come along and expand it. LaMona (talk) 01:59, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V. Zero sources in the article itself, which is what matters to readers.  Sandstein   11:48, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the nudge. I have now added the above reference and recommend a keep.--Rpclod (talk) 12:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the nudge. I have now added the above reference and recommend a keep.--Rpclod (talk) 12:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.