Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quaker Alley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 14:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Quaker Alley

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I am reluctant to prod this, as there might be coverage of the rat-baiting in Victorian publications that haven't made it online. Can anyone find a reason to keep it? Please? —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  17:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I love rat-baiting as much as the next guy, but if that's the only notability connection, then this article doesn't hold up. MarkBul 18:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Was the rat-baiting champion the Master Baiter? —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  19:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment -That's shocking!! How old are you?:)Merkinsmum 19:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and Merge to rat-baiting, if the content isn't already there, which the photo is I see. IvoShandor 11:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and Merge to rat-baiting and Somers Town, as this gives some flavour of the historic Somerstown, largely eliminated by Kings Cross and St Pancras. Otherwise, it's just an orphaned factoid. Kbthompson 15:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * unless of course there are other sources. DGG (talk) 09:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete unless a reliable source can be found. The source listed is a book-selling, Amazon-linking blog and not necessarily to be trusted. Perhaps it's just my suspicious nature, wondering why they were talking about dollars in old London town... Sheffield Steel talkersstalkers 21:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 02:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.