Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qualified personal residence trust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure)  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  08:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Qualified personal residence trust

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article written by, all of whose edits revolve around lawyer Jacob Stein. All of the articles the user edited and created are sourced primarily to, repeatedly credit, and otherwise promote lawyer Jacob Stein (including his bio article). As the work mentions use of Stein's material "with his permission," I have to assume WP:COI is a factor here, in addition to the more obvious WP:PROMO. The articles are some years old now but have not been substantially edited otherwise. It's possible there are some notable concepts here, but notability is not the [primary] basis for this nomination.

For context, I came across these articles when I was going through edits of a[nother] spam-only account and noticed one site he/she added had been added to many other wiki pages, too. The site was maximumassetprotection.com, also run by Jacob Stein.

Also nominating Jacob Stein and Foreign trust. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 06:30, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 06:49, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * I don't think the nomination advances any valid rationale for deletion. This article does not promote Jacob Stein. Merely citing him as a source does not justify deletion on grounds of advertising. COI, even if it exists, is not a grounds for deletion. The topic satisfies GNG, with entire chapters of books devoted to the concept. James500 (talk) 23:51, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge? Isn't this just another name for a Medicaid trust? Bearian (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.