Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quality villas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:10, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality villas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability: seems like a very ordinary company. Name makes googling problematic, but cited sources certainly do not. The New Statesman article, for instance, does not mention the company as far as I can see. TheLongTone (talk) 13:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:06, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - I'm more inclined to delete simply because there aren't that many good third-party sources about this, although it'd be nice it were kept because at least it's neat and sourced given there are much worse articles that need tending to, but there could still be better sources. My searches found nothing particularly outstanding aside from this. FWIW, I searched with "Quality villas travel company" and seemed to have worked (no explosion of other results for "quality villas"). SwisterTwister   talk  05:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  15:44, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Couldn't find any sources providing much significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG. APerson (talk!) 17:22, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – Does not meet WP:N, verified after several internet source searches. North America1000 22:21, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. There are virtually no reliable sources that this company even exists. We are not a webhost for exclusive time share companies. Bearian (talk) 19:23, 13 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.