Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantal

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Mgm|(talk) 21:26, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

Quantal
Part neolgism, part adversitment/book review --nixie 02:09, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. Original research, book advertisement. Quantal seems to be an existing word, an adjective relating to the noun quantum. It is used in this sense in Bernard Katz. quantal + "john tyler" gets 29 Google hits. No reference to this in Wikipedia, and the only John Tyler here is the American president. JoaoRicardo 05:21, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mikkalai 08:21, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete original research, ad, possible vanity, on a sesame seed bun. --Deathphoenix 02:54, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect&mdash;do not merge&mdash;to quantum. In general use, it means "having to do with quanta". The current article just seems to be about one guy's portmanteau of two popular scientific words that have little or nothing to do with what he's talking about. Do not count this as a vote towards keeping without a redirect.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 22:46, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * DELETE --ZayZayEM 14:52, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)