Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantitative Isomorphic Multichannel Marketing Analysis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sandahl 02:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Quantitative Isomorphic Multichannel Marketing Analysis

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not make clear the difference between this and data mining. No evidence that this is a widespread term. No Ghits for "Quantitative Isomorphic Multichannel Marketing Analysis". Alksub 22:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It appears to be a spam vehicle for the company given as reference links. I've removed the external links as there is no mention of this concept at that site, and so they add nothing to the article. No search hits, no references, just a lot of vague marketspeak and a title formed by squishing five buzzwords together. The single-purpose account behind the article's creation forgot to log back in for the second round of editing, and their IP resolves to Ashburn, Virginia &mdash; very close to Reston, Virginia, where the upperquadrant.com domain registrant is located. Coincidence? Or is this marketing company just trying to write a really great article for free? Thomjakobsen 23:31, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Expeditiously redesignate into a demonstrably less visible state - Either spam, completely made up or sourced from a single unverifyable place that reads far too much Dilbert. - Peripitus (Talk) 00:12, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as crap article, per nom. It's poorly written, unreferenced and likely just a marketing vehicle. Majoreditor 01:55, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete without the spam link it's just unverifiable gobbeldygook (no insult to turkeys or goblins intended). SkierRMH 17:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions.   -- Gavin Collins 08:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable neogolism. --Gavin Collins 12:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't delete just yet -- please review the rewrite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeanfromVA (talk • contribs) 21:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The article still has no reliable sources and is unverifiable. Thomjakobsen 22:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.