Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantros


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:08, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Quantros

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:CORP. Company does not seem to be notable, and while the article does contain sources, they are all press releases or dead links (WP:GNG). The article was created by what appears to be a Single Purpose Account created to promote the company. The user has since become inactive. Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 22:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —BurtAlert (talk) 22:20, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

I vote to keep. I have no finantial ties to the company, but I do do medication error research. This is certianly a significant company for people in my line of work. PCAndrew (talk) 16:08, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Notable they may be, but I cannot find any reliable secondary sources to support that claim. -- Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 16:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Here are four references:
 * California firm provides database for KC Health Care Council, Kansas City Business Journal, May 20, 2003
 * Quantros PSO To Work With Texas To Improve Care For Developmentally Disabled, TheStreet, September 7, 2010
 * Quantros helps hospitals reduce medical errors, prevent them, Silicon Valley / San Jose Business Journal, September 26, 2010
 * The hub nation, Indian Express, April 29, 2010
 * I believe that these articles show that the company is notable.Cullen328 (talk) 19:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.