Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum (software)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus to keep following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 08:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Quantum (software)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Aspect of Firefox. This redevelopment can be covered in the relevant Firefox articles themselves as part of its history ViperSnake151   Talk  20:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Already too large to merge back into the Firefox article, and it is linked to from other locations and will likely be linked to from others shortly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 04:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:42, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Quantum has received coverage apart from just being an update to Firefox -- in fact, Quantum is the product version of Servo (layout engine), which is notable on its own. &mdash;cnzx (talk) 02:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm using Firefox Quantum and think its a great improvement. That said, I'd keep this (not just because I like it). I know firefox has a million versions and we can't have an article on every one, but this was a major change in the software (especially in performance). I'd also propose a rename to "Firefox Quantum" because that's the actual name of the product. --Rusf10 (talk) 03:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep The new software has been widely covered in the media and these sources are reflected in the article. Alansohn (talk) 04:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.