Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum Finance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. joe deckertalk to me 16:56, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Quantum Finance

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Prod removed by article's author. This looks to me like original research. &mdash; RHaworth 06:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep as clearly a notable topic. Two books on the subject, 39 hits on Google Scholar for articles with the phrase in the title: 200 articles and 780 books refer to the phrase.  If the article is OR, then it can be fixed.  Sergeant Cribb (talk) 17:29, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 20 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep but article is obscure and seems promotional, Cut down to 25%. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC).
 * Keep - notable topic, and well sourced (but poorly written) article. I have removed the lengthy derivations from the article, since Wikipedia is not a textbook. Gandalf61 (talk) 09:55, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * keep - looks like it's shaped up from the time of nomination. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:28, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.