Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quark Interactive Designer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to QuarkXPress. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:23, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quark Interactive Designer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My searches noticeably found nothing better than this, this, this and this, nothing at all particularly better convincing with the best source only being the MacWorld (English and Spanish reviews from browsers). At best, it's still thin for solidity. SwisterTwister  talk  07:59, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  08:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  08:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. No sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:04, 10 June 2016 (UTC).
 * See WP:NOIMPROVEMENT and WP:NEXIST. North America1000 09:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

 References
 * Merge to QuarkXPress, which presently has no mention of the topic. This will improve the merge target article, as per WP:PRESERVE. Some sources exist, such as those listed below, some of which I have added to the article, but the overall depth of coverage about the topic may not be enough to support a standalone article. North America1000 09:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * "Quark Interactive Designer". Macworld España. page 84.
 * "Quark Interactive Designer". Macworld España. page 84.
 * "Quark Interactive Designer". Macworld España. page 84.
 * Merge to QuarkXPress. Software article of borderline notability, given the RS Maclife article. The QuarkXPress 8 book is RS, but since it is primarily about the main product, does little to show that Quark Interactive Designer has notability independent of QuarkXPress.Dialectric (talk) 15:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.