Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quarry Road


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Quarry Road

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )


 * Delete. Non-notable road, unreferenced, disputed prod. WWGB (talk) 13:04, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't seem very notable. Also completely unsourced. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 17:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Grahame (talk) 10:49, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence that this is a notable road. Note: if this is a section that is concurrent with a numbered route (State Highway 21, as the infobox claims), then it would be more appropriate to create/expand an article on that numbered route and include any sourced information there. Numbered routes are generally considered notable, but the myriad named streets that they run along in any given town do not necessarily have stand-alone notability. -- Kinu t /c  19:24, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article does not demonstrate the subject's notability under WP:GNG. As is stated above, national or state highways are generally notable because thy government funds and maintains the road, the general public takes an interest in their highway systems and the press covers them as items of interest, commerce and mobility. The individual component streets used in a larger highway's routing need to demonstrate that those streets are notable on their own, and not "borrowing" notability from the larger highway. At this time, this article does not pass the test, but if it can, I would be willing to keep the article.  Imzadi  1979   →  20:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Road alone does not appear too important.  Dough 48  72  20:42, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of meeting WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 11:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.