Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qublix games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Qublix games

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Small game company with no evidence of meeting WP:CORP criteria for inclusion. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:55, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 12.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 20:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

These are just some quick links i was able to find. A leading gaming company that works with major players in the industry cannot be called small: http://www.adweek.com/digital/qublix-launches-candy-bubble-rush-on-facebook/ https://www.aol.com/article/2012/06/30/jewel-journey-facebook-review/20269716/ https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=forest+rescue+game https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=qublix+poker — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chriscpop (talk • contribs) 20:26, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Merely "work[ing] with major players" is irrelevant, since "basking in someone else's reflected glory" isn't a notability standard. --Calton | Talk 02:27, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * YouTube videos on the games that they've made do not establish notability. Read WP:GNG. The topic needs significant coverage from reliable independent sources and it doesn't have that. --The1337gamer (talk) 09:38, 15 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is literally a directory listing, and the only reference is a Facebook company press notice that one of the company's games was one of 23 "top Facebook games of 2013". --Calton | Talk 02:27, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP. Non-notable company. Topic is lacking significant coverage from reliable independent sources. Not a single reliable source at WP:VG/RS has an article discussing the company in depth. There's just a handful of passing mentions of their games. --The1337gamer (talk) 09:38, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. TheDeviantPro (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom DarjeelingTea (talk) 15:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:25, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:25, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:25, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - No significant reliable coverage. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.