Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quebre As Correntes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. As the chart that was used to show notability is deprecated, the consensus is clearly to delete --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 01:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Quebre As Correntes

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:NSONG. simply charting at no. 43 for 1 week is not sufficient for notability. mainly mentioned in third party coverage with other songs. LibStar (talk) 06:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The song has charted, and is therefore notable. The nominator's claim that this is insufficient is clearly incorrect. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - That might be true. But the chart that's used is listed on Wp:BADCHARTS, so is automatically discounted. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  16:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * wouldn't expect anything less than a keep vote despite this song clearly not meeting WP:NSONG. LibStar (talk) 23:04, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep The article meets all the specifications of Wikipedia and is part of the life history of the related article Fresno.*Fr@nkl!nG* (talk) 01:13, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * seems like you copy and paste this identical argument without saying how it meets WP:NSONG. LibStar (talk) 01:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * delete: The charting claim was on hot100brasil.com, which is listed on WP:BADCHARTS. It's an amateur compilation, and exhaustive search has demonstrated that it has no notability. Thus, this fails WP:NSONGS.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:11, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - we have several AfD's for articles about individual songs by Fresno and they're pretty much all the same. A basic mention of the fact that the song was released as a single, a video was produced, and the video has supposedly become popular on YouTube. *Fr@nkl!nG* is claiming in all cases that the articles should be kept as relevant for the band's history, but there are the same issues with WP:NSONGS in all cases. Tidbits of historical trivia can be added to the article for the parent album (in this case, Ciano (album)). Per precedent and longstanding WP guidelines, there is no reason to keep this and the other song articles. D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 18:17, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pretty much fails WP:NSONG. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:41, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.