Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen's Quay Terminal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep by consensus. --Aarktica 18:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Queen's Quay Terminal
non notable mallcruft. Makes no assertion of notability. Not inherently notable by itself, unlike some of the other more famous malls in toronto &rArr;    SWAT Jester    On Belay!  19:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Added claim of importance, keep per that and . --W.marsh 19:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is an upscale office building with a shopping area rather than a pure mall, and it is an important part of the revitalization of Toronto's Harbourfront area. --Eastmain 19:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletions.   -- Eastmain 19:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletions.   -- Eastmain 19:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the mall apparently has only 503,000 sq ft of GLA, making it less than a super-regional mall. Absent  multiple reliable indendent references with non-trivial coverage, it does not appear to merit an article. Edison 20:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per W Marsh's finding and article asserts "notablity" now. Important Toronto Harbor revitalization project.--Oakshade 04:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep does seem to assert notability and provide multiple sources. Granted, the sources are organised and included shit-assed backwards, but that just means the article needs a cleanup and copyedit. WilyD 21:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.