Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen's Wish: The Conqueror


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  MBisanz  talk 14:42, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Queen's Wish: The Conqueror

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to be notable per WP:NGAME (the cited sources are either not independent or do not have significant commentary or analysis, also WP:TOSOON (since it hasn't even been released yet). Only contributor is an account which may be related to the game's publisher (based on their contribution history). creffett (talk) 13:01, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 13:01, 24 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, covered in decent detail in RSes and appears to be notable.          - Bryn (talk)  (contributions) 14:44, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Per Bryn. While it might not quite be passing SUSTAINED, I think it would be rather pointless to delete it, only to recreate it shortly after when it releases and gets reviews.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'm sorry if I created the impression I work for Spiderweb. I'm just a big fan. If you want to delete it because it doesn't have enough press, that's fine. I'm sure someone will recreate the page when the game is out in a few weeks and reviews start coming in. 21:18, 26 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herazade (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.