Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen Will Be Crowned


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No consensus to delete as rewritten, that is.  Sandstein  05:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Queen Will Be Crowned

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable bootleg. This isn't etree, we don't need an entry for every bootlegged concert. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 14:37, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  19:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. No significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 00:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Why are the references listed not reliable, third party sources? Rlendog (talk) 17:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: no significant coverage, a non-notable bootleg. JamesBurns (talk) 02:31, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Bootleg with no media coverage of significance. Fails WP:NALBUMS. TheJazzDalek (talk) 17:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, a bootleg with no major 3rd party coverage or notability. A-Kartoffel (talk) 19:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, refactor and rename to be an article about the concert and radio broadcast. This bootleg recording has a lot of references to it on the Internet, but I realize these may not be up to the standards of reliable sources usually demanded. The actual concert, however, broadcast on BBC Radio 1 as part of their In Concert series, is notable. There is coverage of it in the book Queen: The Early Years. And according to the book Classic Queen, the concert was recorded on 13 September 1973 and broadcast on 20 October. I sure wish I had access to 1970s British publications because I'd be willing to bet that plenty of reliable source coverage could be found there. In my extensive online research of Queen for the last day or two I don't think I've found any British publications from that decade that are available online, other than the the few Times reviews I've found at www.queenarchives.com. DHowell (talk) 21:01, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Update: I've accordingly added references, edited and renamed this article to Queen Live at Golders Green Hippodrome. DHowell (talk) 21:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  | Talk 19:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, no reliable independent coverage of bootleg. TheClashFan (talk) 01:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Did you miss that this article is no longer solely about the bootleg, but about the actual concert and broadcast, which does have reliable independent coverage? DHowell (talk) 06:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —DHowell (talk) 07:16, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - per the work DHowell has done since nomination. !Voters should look at the article, its sources and the changes since nomination first, and then !vote. -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  07:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.