Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen Zee (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Queen Zee
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

UPE/COI editing of article which was deleted in 2021. Same issues still exist. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women,  and Africa.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG.  NYC Guru (talk) 11:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Weak keep due to significant coverage (and award, not a notable award yet, but could be); significant coverage (includes quotes from her Facebook, but seems independent); significant coverage (short article, but about her). Weak because they are not the most renowned sources and my understanding of the South Sudan media landscape is low, and the third article is short. CT55555  (talk) 14:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Note that there is a British rock group also called Queen Zee, as seen here: . As for this Queen Zee, see #8 at WP:NMUSICIAN, which says that an act can be notable if they won a major award. The South Sudan Music Award is unlikely to qualify because it is a largely self-promoting ceremony and the honor of winning does not generate reliable and significant media coverage in that country or elsewhere. Queen Zee also got some minor coverage for an arrest, but that is not significant enough for WP:PERP either. And finally, her music is still largely confined to all the typical streaming services and sites that reprint promotional blurbs. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 15:33, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't appear to meet the requirements stated by WP:GNG, not seen or found any reliable sources as yet. -- StarryNightSky11   ☎  01:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above comments; the article does not currently pass WP:GNG. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 16:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. For the reasons stated in the nomination and in the comments above. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.