Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen puabi dna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 22:32, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Queen puabi dna

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Almost incomprehensible, Written like an essay, NPOV violations Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 07:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: If the Puabi article contained sourced info about her DNA, a redirect there would be appropriate. But even if her DNA had been recovered (as the nominated page fantasizes), it would not be worth a separate article. —teb728 t c 09:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: nothing in this article is worth keeping, and Puabi is the place where any sourced content would belong. A redirect is not appropriate, since this poorly capitalised title is not a plausible search term. -- 120.23.19.108 (talk) 07:33, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A10. --Sammy1339 (talk) 18:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete There's no indication of notability, no sources, it's almost unreadable, and its clearly fails WP:NPOV. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 19:57, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.