Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queens Place Mall

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. &mdash; J I P | Talk 19:10, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Queens Place Mall
nn mall Delete --Aranda56 02:12, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Elmhurst, New York or someplace, or keep. Kappa 09:25, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * If there is any indication that this place is an integral part of Elmhurst (never been there), then I agree with Kapp: merge and redirect. The article states that this mall is an adjunct to a place called Queens Center (which should get deliberation), so it seems that it's not particularly significant in the town except as part of another mall that is probably the major shopping outlet.  Therefore, this is an article about a tiny thing.  Delete and let the author perform the merges him/herself.  Geogre 11:26, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I dont see much wrong with this article. With some expansion it could be just fine.
 * Keep and shut the fuck up geogre. --SPUI (talk) 22:42, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Here goes the Bad Language Again I think he had been warned about it as i found out from that road article i nominated for VFD and i feel like he placed keep in sign of bad faith. --Aranda56 23:15, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge per Kappa. JYolkowski // talk 02:12, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A non-notable mall, just like most other malls. Quale 05:57, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This isn't a business directory. Pilatus 13:09, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. For one thing, I know this perfectly know that it isn't a business directory but it is noticable when viewed from arial photos and articles that know its existance wheather it's supportive or controversial. I agree with previous keep reason, it just need expansion. I'm just acknowledging the existance of such a place.SignalMan
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.