Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queer justice league


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 20:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Queer justice league

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Organisation a few months old. My prod was removed on the grounds that the article "asserts importance". I do not see any such assertion and certainly no evidence of notability is offered. -- RHaworth 07:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Delete per nom. I feel it's put together well, and while the name is a little controversial, I feel its importance, especially to the LGBT community asserts itself. I added a cat as requested, a project tag on the talk page, and an appropriate stub tag, but even that I suppose may leave questions unanswered as to it's notability. Carter | Talk to me 07:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Did you think that external links might also help? -- RHaworth 09:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't add them. I don't know what you tone is meant to be taken as, but once again, wasn't me who did it. Carter | Talk to me 12:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - no reliable sources that attest to the notability of the fledgeling organization. Nice to read that Larry's still at it, though. Otto4711 12:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Otto. Didn't know he was still stirring up trouble, and am glad he is!  When the org has a little more third-party reliable press, *then* it can have an article. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  16:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -RiverHockey 18:22, 20 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.