Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queer literary interpretation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Queer theory. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 16:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Queer literary interpretation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Original research. Article is advocating personal opinions, and reads like an essay. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:47, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Queer theory as Sadads suggests below. Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. This looks like someone's homework. I feel it's highly likely this is actually an academic field of study with a broad spectrum of works, but then I'm expecting that there would be a very obvious merge target on the encyclopedia already, and I haven't found any. Maybe redirect to Homosexuality . Ivanvector (talk) 23:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Suggest redirect. Valid topic, not just opinion, but should be covered at Queer theory, which is what the field is called usually. Sadads (talk) 00:24, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Aha! That's the merge target I was looking for. I agree, and have updated my comment. Ivanvector (talk) 03:16, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Either a merge or redirect' is fine. The topic is covered in Queer theory, but can always be improved. See WP:CHEAP, and pardon the pun. Bearian (talk) 15:05, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Queer Theory which is the proper term for the theorization and analysis of cultural objects through the lens of queer studies.--Theredproject (talk) 15:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.