Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quemar Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  09:18, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Quemar Press

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NCORP. Primary sources make up the majority of listed references, others are reviews of books that the Press is affiliated with. They have a notable publication with the Play with Knives trilogy, but I think this is WP:TOOSOON for the company to have its on WP page. Comatmebro (talk) 04:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I tend to be lenient with articles about well established publishing houses. This one is only a year old, so I think that it is too soon for a Wikipedia article without references to significant coverage in impeccable independent sources. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  05:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The article I created, Quemar Press, is being discussed for deletion. Thank you Cullen328 for suggesting I discuss my attempts to improve the article here. I just added more independent references to Quemar Press in Mainstream Media, such as The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Guardian and Mainstream Literature such as that of Giramondo Publishing. Are there any other ways I could improve the Quemar Press article during this discussion? JMMNMT (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment, as a relatively new publisher this appears to be a case of WP:TOOSOON, also as the founder, Katharine Margaret Toohey, is the daughter of Jennifer Maiden and (at the moment) the 'main claim for fame' is the publishing of some of Maiden's works, we could have a redirect and/or a sentence or two in the Maiden article instead of this standalone. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:14, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

When I created this page, I did not know a year was too soon. Now that I know about the 'too soon' issue, I consent to its deletion. Thanks everyone for your time, editing and courtesy JMMNMT (talk) 09:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.