Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quentin Lacour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Quentin Lacour

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about footballer who made 2 appearances in the fully-pro French second division several years ago. The online coverage of this player is routine (e.g., match reports, transfer announcements, or statistical database entries) except for a few blog posts and a Le Parisien article covering Villefranche's amazing run in the Coupe de France this year (but these articles'/posts' only reference to Lacour is a very brief interview on how he exchanged shirts with Marquinhos and a very impressive selfie taken with Mbappe ). There is nothing that suggests this coverage comes close to satisfying WP:GNG. Prior consensus (e.g., Articles for deletion/Phakamani Mngadi) is that a nominal amount of play in a fully-pro league doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL when an article comprehensively fails WP:GNG - as is the case here. Jogurney (talk) 20:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep coverage, including (assumedly, this was linked to by a shorter article which covered him),  passes WP:GNG. Also some minor references can be added to the article such as, , , . Also technically passes WP:NFOOTY. SportingFlyer  T · C  00:09, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:55, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - passes WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 08:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NFOOTBALL.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:39, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete – If you count the 3 Feb 2019 Le Progres article SF linked to (first link) as significant coverage, that's it, that's the only one. The others are either a couple-sentence mentions, or an interview (primary source). Without significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources, GNG isn't met, and 2 appearances is just a nominal NFOOTY pass. Leviv&thinsp;ich 06:33, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep this passes GNG with sources provided and meets the agreed football notability consensus per professional league. Borgarde (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.