Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queplix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 16:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Queplix
Not notable Sleepyhead 10:16, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:CORP. The number of buzzwords involved also indicates that this is spammy. MER-C 11:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Kf4bdy talk contribs 23:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,  Nish kid 64  20:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nomination. Article reads spammy/advertisement. Xdenizen 20:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per MER-C. There might also be a conflict of interest. The article was created by what I suspect was an SPA. --Brad Beattie (talk) 23:34, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Its an advert for sure, outside the scope of Wikipedia scope_creep 00:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Do not Delete No different than a description of thousands of other companies -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.17.138 (talk • contribs)
 * Speedy Delete Per MER-C because it fails WP:CORP. Daniel5127 (Talk) 23:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Do not Delete In the current article no buzzwords. Just a company description, much less text than thousands of other companies, but descriptive. This is an open source software company, which obviously some users here want to see removed from Wiki. --
 * Comment. The company that created this article just contacted me with a fairly obvious form letter. Leads me to believe there's some serious conflict of interest in this entry. --Brad Beattie (talk) 01:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If I saw this on a RC Patrol, I'd probably mark it "speedy" for lacking any assertion of notability. --TheOtherBob 17:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.