Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Querix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 02:38, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Querix

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Small software company. Doesn't satisfy General notability guideline or organizations and companies notability guideline. Consequently, the article violates verifiability policy: the company main business is IBM Informix-4GL compilers, but Google books, news and scholar search for the combination of "Querix" and "4GL" returns nothing useful (not to be confused with Querix natural language interface, another software not connected to the company under discussion). ElComandanteChe (talk) 22:20, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ElComandanteChe (talk) 22:27, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ElComandanteChe (talk) 22:27, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ElComandanteChe (talk) 22:27, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Please note the related AfDs of Querix product articles: --ElComandanteChe (talk) 22:31, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * LyciaStudio AfD
 * LyciaBI AfD
 * Lycia (software) AfD
 * Delete per nomination. No showing of significant effects on history, technology, or culture outside the IT department. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was unable to find anything more than minor mentions through any of the Google searches.  Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH.  Msnicki (talk) 03:15, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.