Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Questions asked during the Q&A session of the second impeachment trial of Donald Trump


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Questions asked during the Q&A session of the second impeachment trial of Donald Trump

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:SPLIT. Why have a list article of all the questions asked during the impeachment trial when Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump covers it just as fine, with more succinctness, and also when Wikisource is available for this exact information? Also, this sort of article never arose during the first impeachment trial of Donald Trump, which was held under similar circumstances, so there's no special notability in this topic. Love of Corey (talk) 12:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Agree with the nom that is this more akin to primary source content, something we should summarize instead of just copying. Transwiki to Wikisource would seem to be the best result. postdlf (talk) 14:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Honestly, this article should not exist for multiple reasons, but a Transwiki seems fair enough. Foxnpichu (talk) 15:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternatively, just a normal Delete seems fair enough. Foxnpichu (talk) 12:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete if the Wikisource people want to include the Congressional Record, they can do it on their own. Clearly not a Wikipedia article topic. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 00:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete total failure of the not indiscriminate guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Shaking my head what some people can create on enwiki as an article.--Darwinek (talk) 02:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete As a perfect example of WP:NOTEVERYTHING. KidAd  •  SPEAK  23:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.