Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quexa-


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Unanimous delete vote for all three articles -- JForget  23:32, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Quexa-

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Co-nominating the following as well:


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. The cited reference is to a proposal, not to an official SI document, and cannot be regarded as a WP:RS Mayalld (talk) 18:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Mayalld (talk) 18:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not even an official proposal, just some random personal web page explicitly saying, "Here is my proposal for extending the system all the way to 1063" (emphasis mine). There's no indication that this set of prefixes was ever under serious consideration for adoption by a proper standards body. Hqb (talk) 19:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. According to BIPM, these are not in official use.  The prefixes, as proposed, seem to exist solely on somebody's mindspring.com web page.  This isn't the place for things made up one day. I can't even call WP:CRYSTAL on this. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect (if appropriate) to Non-SI prefix (albeit I'm not suggesting right now whether the redirect is the correct action to take or not). The proposal seems to be from someone who describes himself as a computer scientist in his online resume.  It is not a proposal from an organisation and it does not appear on the official SI website. NerdyNSK (talk) 19:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless reliably sourced. Also, should be removed from Non-SI prefix if not sourced.  D C E dwards 1966  19:52, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, not listed here. Tim Vickers (talk) 21:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. John254 00:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.