Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quick-Garden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Quick-Garden

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't believe this is a notable company and I think it fails WP:CORPDEPTH. The article creator has set up what looks like a single-purpose account and likely has an undeclared conflict of interest. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 12:59, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 12:59, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 07:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete A run-of-the-mill business with no indications of notability, references are either passing mentions (or don't reference the company at all), or rely on quotations from the company. References fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGING, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 13:59, 11 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.