Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quickerwit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Quickerwit
Fails WP:CORP and WP:WEB. Only 100 unique ghits, although 25000 raw hits. No independent coverage as far as I can see. Current entry is a blatant advert, not to mention a copyvio since the content is exactly that of the official webpage of the service. Pascal.Tesson 07:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Spamgasmic. 205.157.110.11 08:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Adtastic. --Daniel Olsen 08:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Vanitiferous. Danny Lilithborne 09:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete spamish vanity per nom, anon110.11, daniel olsen, and danny lilithborne and as per WP:SPAM, WP:NN, and WP:VANITY ST47 11:48, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Paddles TC 13:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. NawlinWiki 14:42, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Advertising AlexTiefling 15:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.