Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quickly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy close. Obvious violation of WP:POINT. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Quickly

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable chain of bubble-tea outlets. Does not pass the basic requirements outlined at WP:N or WP:CORP for the existance of an article. There is nothing at all which appears to count for substantive coverage of this topic as required by WP:N. Without the existance of actual substantive references about this company, as written by reliable sources, the article should be deleted. FrosteaTheSnowman (talk) 00:56, 7 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Don't do this Frostea - I know you are upset over the deletion of Tapioca Express, which I believe could have been rescued (its now userified to me so I can work on it) but this is not the way to handle it. Please withdraw this nomination.--Milowent • talkblp-r  01:01, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.