Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quickoffice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Luna Santin 23:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Quickoffice

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Contesting a prod: reasoning was that software is non-notable, but google came up with a pretty good number of hits, so I decided to bring to afd for those more knowledgeable to help out. For now, I am neutral. Patstuarttalk 22:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless context and sources addded. Stifle (talk) 20:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Inadequate referencing, and no evidence that this software is any more notable than other document viewers. WMMartin 22:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.