Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quicks Farm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 01:06, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Quicks Farm

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable - fails WP:GNG Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 10:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 *  delete Up merge toRound Maple, as previously mentioned in this cfd Using google to search for the buildings there's nothing of apparent substance to raise any expectation of possible furture expansion. Noting that this building is a Grade II listed building and lacks any additional significance beyond when it was built. Gnangarra 11:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Couldn't find any sources to demonstrate notability and there's not really anything worth merging. Jimmy Pitt   talk  14:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Grade II buildings are not inherently notable & there is nothing to suggest that this article could ever be expanded beyond the basic EH listing information. It was originally covered by a sentence in Round Maple which can be reinstated. Nancy  talk  18:33, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, insufficient notability for an article. Richard Harvey (talk) 15:33, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, agree with Nancy.--J3Mrs (talk) 20:59, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.