Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quickstep buses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Quickstep buses

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article doesn't cite any references. It doesn't appear to be notable for inclusion into the encyclopedia. versace1608 (talk) 02:01, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete -- NN and probably defunct. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing happened and never will. Szzuk (talk) 21:06, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Maybe a sentence could be added in the First Leeds article about the company (which appears to have been called Quickstep Travel), as the Quickstep brand was used for several years after acquisition (which was probably earlier than stated in the article). It's unlikely to be notable enough for a separate article, and the article isn't worth merging in its current state. Peter&#160;James (talk) 20:43, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as a very short non notable company. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  15:16, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.