Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quidco (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 13:03, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Quidco
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This COI/UPE puff piece (though dating from before paid-editor disclosure became obligatory) has already been nominated three times for deletion, but not since the changes to our notability requirements for companies. The sources in the article do not demonstrate notability: the Daily Mail is deprecated as a source, and the brief mentions in the Observer and Which? do not add up to much. Nor do I find any independent in-depth coverage elsewhere: it gets many hits of the "get £15 cash back through Quidco" type on GNews, as expected as a part of its routine business; and a handful of passing mentions on GBooks. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:00, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:49, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:49, 3 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Promotional, no RS. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 03:28, 6 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete- advertising brochure. Reyk YO! 13:29, 6 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.