Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quietdrive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash talk 01:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Quietdrive
Vanity, advertising James084 20:43, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, there's a rule about non-notable bands somewhere, I haven't bothered to look it up yet, but I'm pretty sure it applies here. O bli (Talk) 20:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under Unremarkable people or groups as per WP:CSD. David Johnson [ T|C ] 21:35, 3 January 2006 (UTC) Delete. Not a speedy, but still a non-notable band IMO. David Johnson [ T|C ] 00:04, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Abstain. Much as I like blowing off NN band vanity, a contract with Epic Records and availability on iTunes makes this one rise above the rest, at least in my opinion. - Lucky 6.9 23:09, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Not a speedy candidate then, but they've still only released three tracks which, as far as I can tell, haven't seen much success. Being signed with a major label doesn't give notability - it may suggest that they'll achieve it in the future, but it doesn't make them notable now (IMO). David Johnson [ T|C ] 00:04, 4 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.