Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quietly (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quietly (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Only evidence of notability is being "featured" in prominent publications, but the sources aren't at all substantial. The Forbes article mentions Quietly once as one of "dozens of startups". The TechVibes article is kind of substantial but not enough to indicate notability on its own. The Vancouver Sun link doesn't work so I don't know about that. The other accolades are not quite getting a Fast 50 award and being featured on "advertise your product" websites. Iago Qnsi (talk) 20:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for flagging this IagoQnsi. Appreciate you taking the time to review the content. I will update the links for the Vancouver Sun. PostMedia Newspapers have updated their linking/taxonomy which is why that link isn't working. I will also add some links from other reputable (i.e. news) sources to address your "unsibstantial" comment. Lastly, I will find a link to the Deloitte list that contains Quietly since that is indeed a legitimate and notable nomination. Agree with your comments re: "advertise your product" websites. We can edit that as well so it's more objectively positioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ONAOVA (talk • contribs) 23:16, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as a somewhat newly started company with nothing else convincing for the applicable notability, current coverage is also questionable. SwisterTwister   talk  05:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Just an ad. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete. Cannot find any notable references for the company.Account2235 (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is an ad and the "We can edit that [...]" comment above shows "they" are putting themselves on wikipedia. DeVerm (talk) 23:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.