Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quigley (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 11:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Quigley (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film ColinFine (talk) 22:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    01:22, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    01:22, 20 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. There were two reviews on the article but I managed to find a third out there, enough to where this would make it a more solid keep than if it only had two reviews. I will admit that there's not a lot out there, which is somewhat surprising given how amazingly bad this film is - normally with things supposed to be this bad, some of the typical sites will review it just for the laughs. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)


 * year:
 * filmmaker:
 * actor:
 * Hungary:
 * Greece:
 * United Kingdom:
 * German:


 * Keep and speedy close Film had wide international release 2003-2012 and multiple reviews in reliable sources. Kudos to for doing some initial work, and a polite trout to the nominator for his lack of WP:BEFORE. Yes, the article was in poor shape when nominated, but being in poor shape is not a deletion rationale for a topic that any diligent BEFORE would have shown was notable.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:12, 20 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Certainly nice amount of demonstrable secondary source coverage for this one. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 09:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep enough sources available to make it notable.  Jim Car ter  06:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep and speedy close for sufficient notabilty. Doczilla  @SUPERHEROLOGIST 08:34, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.