Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quigley (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ on account of the argument that the subject meets GNG.  Arbitrarily0  ( talk ) 16:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Quigley (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NSINGER; PROD removed. Bgsu98  (Talk)  20:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Television.  Bgsu98   (Talk)  20:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Certainly fails NSINGER, but I think the article does meet the general notability guidelines – there have been plenty of articles about her since her time on American Idol. Most of the articles are about her status as an influencer, not as a singer. Whatever we think of that as an occupation, RS seem to consider her notable enough to report on her now and then. --Tserton (talk) 20:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and California. Skynxnex (talk) 20:56, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Tserton. pburka (talk) 21:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets WP:GNG based on cited sources. ~Kvng (talk) 21:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. A few years ago, fans like me were trying to create articles for the runners up ("the best of the rest"), but the consensus has changed to include only the winners, or at most the 2nd or 3rd place, of major reality shows. See the recent discussion at Articles_for_deletion/Melissa_Sgambelluri. In this case, there isn't significant coverage in reliable sources to keep a BLP under even general notability guidelines, much less for a singer. Bearian (talk) 15:23, 19 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: unless I'm missing something, we've already got enough sources in the article to pass GNG. I understand the AfD consensus linked by User:Bearian to mean that a person is not notable solely for being a runner-up on a major show: that's separate from whether they've received WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources to pass GNG. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 17:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.